The articles of confederation and the constitution Essay

The articles of confederation and the constitution Essay


The simple difference between the Articles of Confederation and US Constitution is that the articles were non strong plenty to keep our immature state together. The articles operated the US as separate provinces. Under the articles. it was really hard to go through Torahs since the demand of 9 out of the 13 states’ blessing was needed for confirmation. The Articles created a loose alliance of autonomous provinces and a weak cardinal authorities. go forthing most of the power with the province authoritiess.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The demand for a stronger Federal authorities shortly became evident and finally led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The members of the Constitutional Convention signed the United States Constitution on September 17. 1787 in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. The Constitutional Convention convened in response to dissatisfaction with the Articles of Confederation and the demand for a strong centralised authorities. After four months of secret argument and many via medias. the proposed Fundamental law was submitted to the provinces for blessing. Although the ballot was near in some provinces. the Constitution was finally ratified and the new Federal authorities came into being in 1789.

Articles of Confederation and Constitution

There were many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the terminal of the American Revolution the free provinces needed some kind of control that would bring forth to a incorporate state. Issues arose such as: How should power be divided between local and national authoritiess? How should Torahs be made. and by whom? Who should be authorized to regulate those Torahs? How could the authorities be designed to protect the inalienable single rights? Their first effort at work outing this issue was the Articles of Confederation. which was a failure for the most portion. but non wholly. After the failure of the articles. the province delegates tried to revise the articles. but alternatively. constructed the Constitution. There were so many alterations made and really small remained the same.

The Articles of Confederation were approved by Congress on November 15. 1777 and ratified by the provinces on March 1. 1781. It was a modest effort by a new state to unify itself and organize a national authorities. The Articles set up a Alliance that gave most of the power to the provinces. Many jobs arose and so a new Constitution was written in 1787 in Independence Hall. The new Constitution called for a much more incorporate authorities with a batch more power.

One of the cardinal differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation is in the manner that they set up the Legislature. The 13 provinces formed a Confederation referred to as the “league of friendship” in order to happen a solution for common jobs such as foreign personal businesss. The Articles of Confederation was the nation’s first Constitution. The articles created a loose Confederation of independent provinces that gave limited powers to the cardinal authorities.

Under the Articles each province could direct between 2 and 7 delegates to Congress. In the Constitution each province was allowed 2 members in the Senate and 1 representative per 30. 000 people ( this figure has now increased greatly ) in the House of Representatives. The provinces with bigger populations wanted representation to be based entirely off of population. The provinces with smaller populations wanted there to be a fixed figure of representatives per province. each province would hold one ballot in the house of Congress. no affair the size of the population.

Under the articles. there wasn’t a strong independent executive. it established as a unicameral legislative assembly. which it refers to as a Congress. The Fundamental law on the other manus establishes a bicameral legislative assembly with an upper house. the Senate. and a lower house. the House of Representatives. In the articles. There wasn’t any judicial subdivision but Congress had the authorization to intercede differences between provinces. Congress was responsible for carry oning foreign personal businesss. declaring war or peace. keeping an ground forces and navy and a assortment of other lesser maps.

But the articles denied Congress the power to roll up revenue enhancements. modulate interstate commercialism and enforce Torahs. Because of this. the cardinal authorities had to bespeak contributions from the provinces to finance its operations and rise armed forces. The provinces attempted to restrict the power of the national authorities because they feared that it would go a monarchy. In an attempt to restrict the power of the national authorities. Congress created one without adequate power to regulate efficaciously. which led to serious national and international jobs.

George Washington called for a convention in late May 1787 ; in order speak about the nation’s political and economical jobs and revise the Articles. Delegates from eleven out of the 13 provinces attended this convention. They decided on a authorities dwelling of three subdivisions: legislative ( Congress ) . executive ( the President ) . and judicial ( Supreme Court ) . These subdivisions were under the checks-and-balances in order to keep balance in powers and to forestall dictatorship in the state. The Great Compromise solved the issue that arose between the delegates that believed the separation of powers into three different subdivisions would guarantee that the United States would non go another monarchy.

The Great Compromise resolved the representation issue by organizing the two houses that we have today by utilizing the thought of a two-house legislative assembly in order to fulfill both sides. It proposed a legislative assembly in which each province would be represented by two senators ( Senate ) and another legislative assembly that would be distributed based on the province population ( House of Representatives ) . Voting in Congress was different in the Articles and the Constitution. Under the Articles of Confederation. each province received 1 ballot regardless of how many representatives it had.

While in contrast to the fundamental law where in one house. the Senate. every province is represented every bit careless of population. In the lower house. the House of Representatives each province receives one representative for a set figure of people. This meant that people could now be represented on a more personal degree through the House of Representatives. This satisfied all of the provinces and helped decide one of the greatest struggles while composing the Constitution. Besides. in the Three-Fifths clause. delegates agreed that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a individual when finding the population and therefore the figure of representatives in the House of each province.

One of the chief failings under the Articles of Confederation was its incapableness to modulate trade and levy revenue enhancements. The provinces controlled all of their “cash flows. ” Sometimes. the provinces were in debt because of duty wars that they would prosecute in with one another. Because of these debts. the provinces refused to give the national authorities the money it needed. Hence. the authorities could non pay off the debts it had gained during the revolution. including paying soldiers who had fought in the war and citizens who had provided supplies to the cause. Congress could non go through needed steps because they lacked the nine-state bulk required to go Torahs and couldn’t amend articles because consentaneous consent of the all provinces was required.

The provinces mostly ignored Congress. which was powerless to implement cooperation. and it was hence unable to transport out its responsibilities. The national authorities could non coerce the provinces to adhere to the footings of the Treaty of Paris of 1783 stoping the American Revolution. Foreign states saw deficiency of integrity in provinces. Because of the deficiency of income the national authorities collected. the new state was unable to support its boundary lines from British and Spanish maltreatment because it could non pay for an ground forces when the provinces would non lend the necessary financess. The state would non acquire rich as a whole because provinces controlled all interstate commercialism. States coined their ain money and regulated its supply. so values of currency varied from province to province.

Under the Constitution. Congress had the right to impose revenue enhancements and modulate commercialism. The delegates – b_elieved that a strong cardinal authorities was a menace to American autonomies and rights. Normally they were states’ rights advocators. backcountry husbandmans. hapless husbandmans. the ill-educated and nonreader. debitors. and paper-money advocators ; the low-income categories of society_ – had an easy clip sketching presidential powers. Although some delegates had utmost opinions-Alexander Hamilton proposed a legitimate monarchy headed by an American king-most agreed that a new executive or president was needed to give the state the strong leading that it had lacked under the Articles.

The primary purpose of the Constitution was to make a strong elective authorities that was antiphonal to the will of the people. although there is some contention over this. Many of the Establishing Fathers believed that the new authorities needed to be insulated from the will of the people ; hence the design of such characteristics as the Electoral College or the election of Senators by the province legislative assemblies. The construct of self-determination did non arise with the Americans ; so. a step of self-determination existed in the United Kingdom at the clip. But the grade to which the Constitution committed the United States to govern by the people was alone. even radical. in comparing with other authoritiess around the universe.

In add-on to spliting the executive sections into four. the Judiciary Act of 1789 was created. The Judiciary Act of 1789 is a jurisprudence that created the Supreme Court. 13 territory tribunals and three circuit tribunals. This act gave the Supreme Court the right to reexamine province Torahs and province tribunal determinations to find whether an act or jurisprudence is constitutional or non. Laws. Acts of the Apostless. civil autonomies were protected by the act every bit good. The delegates wanted to construct a authorities for the people. On the opposing side. there were the Federalists. Federalists were protagonists of the Constitution that desired a strong cardinal authorities. Federalists felt that the Articles of Confederation were weak and uneffective. They felt that National authorities would protect the rights of the people.

Over two 100 suggestions were submitted to Congress in order to protect American citizen rights. but merely 10 were chosen. These 10 suggestions became the first 10 amendments. known as our Bill Of Rights.

The Articles of Confederation are a major portion of the US’s roots. Some of the thoughts and theories from the Articles were strong and did seek to break the US but they weren’t applied the strong plenty. Ideas such as the Bill of Rights derived from the Articles. When I think back to how great the Constitution has worked it genuinely amazes me. It has lasted for over two centuries and continues to assist our authorities map today. The US was able to construct upon the errors of the Confederation’s first authorities. Life by the phrase “united we stand and divided we fall” the US has been able to construct a strong authorities for its people. doing alterations as clip goes by.


“Comparing the Articles and the Constitution – The U. S. Constitution Online – USConstitution. cyberspace. ” _Comparing the Articles and the Constitution – The U. S. Constitution Online – USConstitution. net_ . Web. 22 Sept. 2014.

Feldmeth. Greg D. “Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution. ” _Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution_ . 31 Mar. 1998. Web. 28 Sept. 2014.

“Journals of the Continental Congress –THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION. WITH AMENDMENTS: : : : : : APRIL–OCTOBER. 1777. ” _Journals of the Continental Congress –THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION. WITH AMENDMENTS: : : : : : APRIL–OCTOBER. 1777_ . Web. 20 Sept. 2014.

“S. Doc. 108-17 – Fundamental law of the United States of America: Analysis. and Interpretation – 2002 Edition. ” _S. Doc. 108-17 – Fundamental law of the United States of America: Analysis. and Interpretation – 2002 Edition_ . 28 Jan. 2002. Web. 23 Sept. 2014.

“Welcome to OurDocuments. gov. ” _Welcome to OurDocuments. gov_ . National Archives Education Staff. The Fundamental law: Development of a Government. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Inc. . 2001. Web. 22 Sept. 2014.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



I'm Beba

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out