What is aggression? During my research. I have noted assorted definitions of aggression and have frequently found it to be coupled with force. This human trait is so complex that it is hard to nail any one description. but I believe that for the intent of this essay. this highly loose term will hold to do. as aggression is viewed otherwise harmonizing to the different attacks. “Aggression – a broad assortment of Acts of the Apostless that involve attack” ( The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology-Third Edition 2001 )
In this essay. I will explicate and measure three psychological attacks of aggression from Sigmund Freud. Burrhus F Skinner and Carl R Rogers.
Sigmund Freud ( 1856-1939 ) developed the psychoanalytical theory of the personality. whereby he divided it into beds ; the unconscious. preconscious and the witting. These represented different degrees of consciousness in our heads. He besides described the personality as the Idaho. which is basically what we are born with and is where the basic sexual and aggressive thrusts reside. the self-importance. which starts to develop every bit shortly as interaction with the environment begins. and the superego. which represents the moral facet of worlds harmonizing to society’s criterions and values. He believed that we are born with these interior feelings of aggression. which we use as a tool to obtain the things we want. but unluckily. society restricts the usage of this atrocious behavior for obvious grounds.
The show of aggressive behavior would do us to lose love and regard stoping in lowered self-esteem. In order to acquire through life without enforcing this unacceptable behavior upon society. we have in our superego. incorporated something called ‘guilt’ . which in bend makes us experience ashamed of this pushy. demanding insisting of gratification side of ourselves. However. this causes within us an ageless struggle that rages on through our mundane lives. in the unconscious degree of our heads. where we merely indistinctly recognize it.
He was nevertheless. concerned that these energies could non be for good ‘bottled up’ and suggested that redirection of these energies ( katharsis ) into other channels ie. athletics. work would be more socially acceptable. He called this sublimation and suggested that a good society would do this possible. However. he remained pessimistic about this besides as it merely redirected the energy of aggression and did non truly cover with the beginning of the ‘problem’ .
Freud ( 1920 ) called the destructive force that forms aggression. Thanatos -the decease inherent aptitude ( Beyond the Pleasure Principle 1920 ) and believed that this is a natural human status that is besides aimed at ourselves. However. our natural life inherent aptitudes prevent anything go oning. but Freud exhaustively believed that the devastation of ourselves is inevitable. as aggression will ever be at war with society and hence the greatest obstruction to peace.
Burrhus F Skinner ( 1904-1990 ) who favoured the behaviorist attack to psychological science. criticised the psychoanalytical theory by proposing that psychological science should be the survey of behavior and non merely the head. However. Skinner’s attack was extremist. in that he did see our inner ideas and feelings. but denied that they had anything to make with behavior ( Skinner 1974 ) . His survey of behaviors involved close contact with the experimental research lab. where he experimented with little animate beings such as rats and pigeons. As the experimenter. he was able to analyze the usage of stimulations and support ( cause and wages ) of behavior.
Skinner pointed out that aggression. like any other signifier of behavior. is a consequence of societal and physical issues in our environments. With this in head. he believed that human behavior is hence governable. In Skinner’s position. if aggression is evident in a individual. so it is determined by past and present relevant events. together with familial gift. familial factors that are passed through our cistrons in the procedure of development. He argued that full cognition of these two sets of factors. familial gift and personal history. keep the key to commanding behaviors such as aggression.
The behaviorist attack fails to admit single free will and pick nevertheless. and the defeats involved in the inability to show these. It is frequently these unobservable issues that cause behaviors. such as aggression. When looking at positive support. Skinner frequently refused to see the mental causes of aggression Internet Explorer if a rummy tries to get down a battle with you in a saloon. Skinner’s theory would bespeak that the best signifier of action from old experience would be to walk off. This nevertheless. ignores the events taking up to this point. and you may make up one’s mind to remain and contend or possibly stay and do friends. The head selects a response harmonizing to the desired effect. which is a natural portion of every map we perform but is non a straightforward instance of positive support.
Carl R Rogers ( 1902-1987 ) was the laminitis of the humanistic attack to behaviour and like Maslow. he believed that there was nil ‘bad’ about human behavior and that we are capable of healthy growing towards Self Actualisation. This means that we have the possible to make fulfillment and accomplish warm relationships with others through credence and apprehension of what we as worlds are.
In order to understand the actualising inclination. Rogers claims that we should foremost be congruous. intending that we should be cognizant of our interior feelings and accept them as a portion of our nature. In this regard. what we express from those feelings is pure and true. Second. we should be able to sympathize with our fellow adult male. in that we can understand what everything means to them from their point of position. as if we were in their ‘world’ . Third. we should be able to convey unconditioned positive respect. significance that we should be able to accept things as they are and who our fellow adult male is. without opinion or bias and without puting conditions upon their worth.
These are three indispensable ingredients for healthy growing towards being a to the full working individual. Obviously. with an attack such as this. there is small room for negative feelings such as aggression. Because of this positive force for healthy growing. Rogers believed that aggression could perchance be a consequence of a province of incongruence. where we may experience struggle between our sense of ego and our ideal ego ( like Freud’s self-importance and superego ) Internet Explorer. When we become cognizant of our ain set of values but are told by our parents to esteem their set of values. taught to us antecedently. and the usage of conditional respect is applied to implement those values. This could perchance do aggression by manner of revenge. However. he would non see aggression as inevitable or even an appropriate response. merely as a possible response.
Rogers’ theory opposes Freud’s in that aggression is inevitable. However. these two attacks are similar in that they both believe that aggression is a consequence of struggle in the head – Rogers’ sense of ego and the ideal ego are similar to Freud’s self-importance and superego. However. Rogers argues that we are non doomed as Freud views it. Rogers. who was optimistic about human nature. believed that instead than seeking to quash the desires and needs that aggression demands. a self-actualised individual would see that aggression is a portion of our nature and that credence of it. along with all other feelings. function to assist us turn healthily in the manner of a to the full working individual. As a humanist. Rogers believed that to seek to conceal from what is inherently a portion of us is ineffectual and the lone attack to do is that of credence in order to believe in ourselves. He besides recognised that aggression could be a healthy behavior. as in competition.
Freud’s position that aggression is a common human feature does non represent cogent evidence that it is unconditioned. His positions on katharsis as being a manner of commanding the thrusts besides lack support. and so support from one of his earlier adherents. Alfred Alder. With respect to aggression being unconditioned and built-in. is aggression the consequence of genetic sciences. or is it merely an alibi we use for violent behavior? Could the answer prevarication in our environment and what we learn from it? Experiments performed by behaviorists such as Skinner have proved this. but do they offer all the replies? Is adult male born a wholly clean slate? If that is the instance. why do we maintain messing up? Is this what Skinner meant when he maintained that adult male takes immediate satisfaction instead than looking at the long-run effects?
The different attacks of Freud and Skinner offer interesting theories about the beginnings of aggression. Take force on the telecasting for case. Freud may hold considered this as a psychotherapeutic experience therefore cut downing the thrust of aggression by manner of syphoning off the built up force per unit area as discussed earlier. On the other manus nevertheless. Skinner would see that force on the telecasting would function to condition us to be more violent and therefore addition aggression.
In decision. it seems that each attack holds some cogency whilst there is still room for farther research. Freud discussed aggression and its beginning at great length but did non truly offer any sound grounds about how to cut down it. Neither did he promote farther research into roll uping more information about it. Skinner. on the other manus. had instead strong sentiments about how to cover with aggression but offered small information as to its beginning.
Rogers had small to state about what aggression really is but whilst his sentiments on how to cover with it seemed realistic and acceptable. his theory. like Freud’s. offers no existent cogent evidence. However. early as these theories were. they did offer some valuable parts to the theory of aggression. Theories which have developed over the old ages and are go oning to make so. even though the grounds for aggression. and so all other human emotions. still elude us. staying continually beyond scientific account.
Bibliography
Glassman. William E ( 2000 )
Approachs to Psychology ( 3rd Edition )
Buckingham and Philadelphia USA Open University Press
Reber. Arthur A and Emily ( 2001 )
The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology ( Third Edition )
London. Penguin Books Ltd
Nye. Robert D ( 1975 )
Three Psychologies: Positions from Freud. Skinner and Rogers ( Fourth Edition )
California. Brooks/Cole ( Wadsworth Inc )
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. goldenessays. com/free_essays/3/psychology/human_aggression. shtml ( accessed 30 12 2002 )
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. term-papers. u/ts/gb/pnl141. shtml ( accessed 30 12 2002 )
World Wide Web. stolaf. edu/people/huff/classes/intro/skinner. hypertext markup language ( accessed 30 12 2002 )
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. free_termpapers. com/tp/37/pko72. shtml ( accessed 30 12 2002 )
hypertext transfer protocol: //www. free_termpapers. com/tp/37/pnl135. shtml ( accessed 30 12 2002 )
