Analyzing the value of crime mapping in the first case, it revolves around consolidating specific strategies for law enforcers to address the situation with ABC precinct. Here, consideration should be made in the value of providing a hotpoint and focused means of facilitating policing measures. Since specific crimes indeed occur in a specific time frame and a given day, increased police presence indeed could prove to be vital towards apprehending criminals and furthering opportunities to induce changes in the environment.
In particular, specific programmes can be implemented to infuse better means of communication with the community and establish partnerships with specific venues that are prone for these crimes to happen. Crime mapping can happen if people would consider addressing a facilitative manner of intervention and determination of how these hotspots can be used as instruments for preventive measures. On the other hand, the second scenario may need a clustered and diffused means of crime mapping.
Since the escalation of crime is not focused primarily on a specific location and time-frame, considerable attention can be made if proper policing measures are scattered and administered in using demographic analyses. Here, programmes may cater to the need of elaborating specific processes that are congruent to the needs of the citizenry and exploring what probable avenues can result to better coverage and protection. Since this is the case, careful collaboration with the citizenry is then essential because the scope of application remains expansive and may cater to many internal factors and processes.
