Existentialism vs. Phenomenology Essay

Existentialism vs. Phenomenology Essay

Existentialism vs. Phenomenology and the response to Hegelian Idealism Absolute idealism was a immense portion of Western civilization but through the 19th and 20th centuries the greatest political motion took topographic point. Marxism was this great political motion. The motion had an affect on divinity and art. Jean-Paul Sartre. a Continental philosopher who lived in the 19th century was an existential philosopher. Some of the chief subjects of extentialism are: • Traditional and academic doctrine is unfertile and remote from the concerns of existent life. • Philosophy must concentrate on the person in her or his confrontation with the universe.

• The universe is irrational ( or. in any event. beyond entire comprehending or accurate conceptualizing through doctrine ) . • The universe is absurd. in the sense that no ultimate account can be given for why it is the manner it is. • Senselessness. emptiness. pettiness. separation. and inability to pass on pervade human being. giving birth to anxiousness. apprehension. diffidence. and desperation. • The single confronts. as the most of import fact of human being. the necessity to take how he or she is to populate within this absurd and irrational universe. ( Moore-Bruder. 2005 )

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The extentialist believed that there was no reply to the experiential quandary. They say life can merely deteriorate and without fighting through life a individual can happen no significance or value to the life they lead. Some of these subjects had already been introduce before Jean-Paul Sartre came up the add-ons. The philosophers. Arthur Schopenhauer. Soren Kierkegaard. and Friedrich Nietzsche were the subscribers to these subjects. All three had a strong antipathy for the optimistic idealism of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and for metaphysical systems in general.

Such doctrine. they thought. ignored the human quandary. For all three the existence. including its human dwellers. is seldom rational. and philosophical systems that seek to do everything seem rational are merely ineffectual efforts to get the better of pessimism and desperation. Soren Keirkegaard’s cardinal inquiry in life was is at that place anything in this universe or outside it to which the person can cleave to maintain from being swept off by the dark tides of desperation? He was as about wholly concerned with how and what the single really chooses in the face of uncertainty and uncertainness.

He thought the lone manner to be grated alleviation from desperation was to hold a entire committedness to God. Friedrich Nietzsche was convinced that the universe was run by a cosmic force and that it is driven by will to power or will power. This manner of thought was rather different from Keirkegarrd. Nietsche believed you had to command your ain fate and prehend what was yours. He led a more exciting life. a more passionate one. Keirkegaard was really down and spent most of his life combating desperation but found comfort in God.

Nietzsche used to state “Which is it. is adult male one of God’s bloopers or is God one of man’s? ” While both of these work forces had different positions from each other they agreed to differ with extentialism. Existentialism as a philosophical motion was something of a direct reaction to perceived societal ailments and was embraced by creative persons and authors every bit much as by philosophers So it is non surprising that two of the greatest existential philosopher philosophers. Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. wrote play. novels. and political piece of lands every bit good as philosophical plants.

Phenomenology involvements itself in the indispensable constructions found within the watercourse of witting experience—the watercourse of phenomena—as these constructions manifest themselves independently of the premises and presuppositions of scientific discipline. ( Moore-Bruder. 2005 ) Phenomenology. much more than existential philosophy. has been a merchandise of philosophers instead than of creative persons and authors. But like existential philosophy. phenomenology has had tremendous impact outside philosophical circles. It has been particularly influential in divinity. the societal and political scientific disciplines. and psychological science and depth psychology.

Phenomena is the differentiation between the manner something is instantly experient and the manner it “is. ” Both Hegel and Kant were philosophers of Phenomenology. Besides. Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger were phenomenologists. Husserl introduced nonnatural phenomenology. whose purpose it was to look into phenomena To look into phenomena in this manner is to “bracket” or “exclude” one’s presupposition about the being or nature of an “external” or “physical” or “objective” universe. Husserl called this procedure phenomenological decrease without doing any premises about the universe.

Heidegger. excessively. was convinced that it was necessary to look at things with fresh eyes. unshrouded by the presuppositions of the present and yesteryear. Harmonizing to Heidegger. we are fundamentally nescient about the thing that matters most: the true nature of Being. It is normally with mention to his earlier work that Heidegger is sometimes called an existential philosopher. Heidegger himself resisted this denomination. Yet he was really much influenced by Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. and the concern expressed in his early plants with such existentialist subjects as fright. apprehension. nonsense. and decease is rather apparent.

Sartre studied in Germany for a brief clip in the 1930s and was influenced by Heidegger. Sartre attributed the construct of forsaking to Heidegger. and Sartre and Heidegger both were concerned with the constructs of bad religion. genuineness. a life’s undertaking. and others. In doctrine it is true that each position even if they are opposing influence one another. In the last tierce of the 20th century. diverse Continental voices were raised against what they saw as leery premises about the significance of right and incorrect. the nature of linguistic communication. and the really possibility of human self-understanding.

Some Continental philosophers have been leery about Western metaphysical systems that they claim lead to the use of nature or that set up a certain cultural or cultural position as absolute truth. As the old ages travel by new philosophers try to turn out the others incorrect and so is the development of doctrine ever on traveling. Reference Moore-Bruder. 2005. Metaphysicss and Epistemology: Being and Knowledge: The Continental Tradition. The Power of Ideas. Sixth Edition. Mc-Graw Hill.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



I'm Beba

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out