Working at McDonald’s is an article that emphasizes how irrelevant working in high school is on the graduated table of importance in life. Amitai Etzioni points out that adolescents are distracted by insistent occupations when they should be concentrating on their instruction. Etzioni makes his statement about teenage occupations sabotaging school attending and engagement. leaving few accomplishments that will be utile subsequently on in life. and skewing the values of adolescents particularly their thoughts about the worth of a dollar. McDonald’s. in this instance. provides “no room for enterprise. creativeness. or even simple rearrangements” says Etzioni.
Etzioni introduces logos into the narrative right from the really get downing in paragraph two. “As many as two-thirds of America’s high school juniors and seniors now hold down parttime jobs” . This refers to the huge bulk of adolescents who maintain a occupation while still traveling to school. In paragraph 13. Son is besides relevant. The writer states that “24 per centum of the seniors at one high school in 1985 worked every bit much as five to seven yearss a hebdomad ; 27 per centum. three to five. ” Although these per centums aren’t comparatively high. the writer claims that there is no manner a teenager’s work won’t interfere with school assignment. In add-on to this factual information. the writer is merely saying that there is no room for personal development if adolescents are merely making insistent undertakings.
Equally good as Sons. ethos can be applied to Working at McDonald’s. Ethos is the strongest entreaty in this narrative because Etzioni backs up all his claims with believable beginnings. In paragraph 10. the writer states that “A 1980 survey by A. V. Harrell and P. W. Wirtz found that. among those pupils who worked at least 25 hours per hebdomad while in school. their unemployment rate four old ages subsequently was half of that of seniors who did non work” . Despite the work experience. Etzioni makes a point that these portion clip occupations “provide no calling ladders. few marketable accomplishments. and undermine school attending and engagement. ”
The statement in Working at McDonald’s was clear. and for a minute. the writer persuaded me to take his side because of the logical ground and facts that are brought up throughout the text. Even though the narrative focuses more on Son and Ethos as opposed to pathos. I felt a sense of emotion because I know what it’s like to work a portion clip occupation ( even two for that affair ) while still in high school. The writer brings up the point that no 1 truly knows where all this hard-earned money goes to ( in paragraph 18 ) ; “Some use it to back up themselves. particularly among the hapless. More middle-class childs set some money aside to assist pay for college. or salvage it for a major purchase-often a auto. ”
I can associate to that statement because my grounds for working during school were to salvage money to set myself through college. derive a sense of independence. every bit good as salvage up for large purchases ( such as a auto ) . Ultimately. after ab initio being persuaded by the writer. I realize that I wholly disagree with him because working two occupations and keeping good classs in school taught me a batch of valuable accomplishments. I learned great clip direction accomplishments. how to be more responsible. communicating accomplishments. and job resolution. I would’ve ne’er learned any of those accomplishments had I non worked in high school no affair how mundane the occupation may hold been. Despite my dissensions. the narrative was filled with great representations of ethos. and logos through logical and believable statements.
